This perfectly captures the central economic paradox of AI: a technology that risks cannibalizing its own market by eliminating its most likely customers. It’s the kind of strategic, real-world tension we explore in The Efficiency Playbook.
What business owners don’t realize, when everything is run by AI and Robotics, no one will be working or have the means to buy the products they produce! They will literally put themselves out of business! AI and robotics must be limited by law! People must be allowed to earn a living!
We were teaching machines to learn in 1980's. The assembly line I was involved with went form 125+ to 42 people the people were standing by in case a robot went down. Shortly after not needing intellect to operate any longer the entire line went to Mexico.....
This perfectly captures the central economic paradox of AI: a technology that risks cannibalizing its own market by eliminating its most likely customers. It’s the kind of strategic, real-world tension we explore in The Efficiency Playbook.
What business owners don’t realize, when everything is run by AI and Robotics, no one will be working or have the means to buy the products they produce! They will literally put themselves out of business! AI and robotics must be limited by law! People must be allowed to earn a living!
We were teaching machines to learn in 1980's. The assembly line I was involved with went form 125+ to 42 people the people were standing by in case a robot went down. Shortly after not needing intellect to operate any longer the entire line went to Mexico.....
Well then ,I guess that we DONT NEED HUMAN BEINGS. That would be nice and there won't any more welfare people..
A very powerful premise. In the past, software was licensed per seat, so every workstation paid to use it. If AI deletes workstations...
Very interesting article. Was it written using AI?